Evaluating and Understanding the Rhetoric of Web Sites

In the evaluation and understanding of source information for research, it is important to understand the "angle of vision" that the author's work is influenced by their personal beliefs and values (Ramage 360).  The angle of vision is shown through the author's figurative language, word choice and emphasis, statements, and the inclusion or the not inclusion of specific details which all work together to shape the text to reflect a specific value system (Ramage 360-61).  The credibility of the author is also derived by their credentials, affiliations, and previous publication data.  For example, an author might be considered to have a particular angle of vision if they only write for the Humane Society or the American Civil Liberties Union. 

            Further considerations in the evaluating the criteria for a Web site includes objectivity, coverage, accuracy, and currency (Ramage 365).  The objectivity of the Web site includes the site's purpose- to explain, inform, or persuade, clear understanding of the point of view, affiliations are clearly stated, and are the intended audience is identified.  The coverage of the Web site should explore in depth the information presented.  The accuracy of the information presented on the Web site should include source information and be verifiable. The information placed on the Web site should be dated and regularly updated to be current and timely.  All the information of the author's credibility, objectivity, coverage, accuracy, and currency should be considered when evaluating and understanding the rhetorical message of a particular author and Web site.  The concept of evaluating and understanding the rhetorical message in essential for a clear understand of a concept. 

Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with    Readings. 8th ed. New York: Longman, 2010. Print.